HRM624 GDB No. 1 Announced (solution)
Thursday, October 28, 2010 Posted In HRM Edit ThisSections 102-106 of the Local Government Ordinance, 2001
This section included in the constitution to help people to get their dispute resolved at small levels. For example divorce case can be resolved at the ‘Nazim’ or even counselor level of the town. This makes people’s life more comfortable and now so many cases of this nature can be resolved at this lower level. Do you think that this law really helps people in resolving issues and reduces the number of cases pending in the courts?
This section included in the constitution to help people to get their dispute resolved at small levels. For example divorce case can be resolved at the ‘Nazim’ or even counselor level of the town. This makes people’s life more comfortable and now so many cases of this nature can be resolved at this lower level. Do you think that this law really helps people in resolving issues and reduces the number of cases pending in the courts?
................
I agree with the statement this helps public. On one hand this reduced the burden of courts and on other, comforted the people by providing justice and resolution to the problems at almost doorsteps. Following have been the advantages of the Ordnance in question:
a. Timely disposal of minor cases but urgent in nature like divorce/ small disputes at early stages etc.
b. Courts due to their location were away so approach to the court was not possible at times, so it gave a chance to dispose off the case locally.
c. Cost was reduce of the justice.
d. Socially needs of people were swiftly available to all.
e. Courts were less Burdened.
f. Quality of life became better.
I agree with the statement this helps public. On one hand this reduced the burden of courts and on other, comforted the people by providing justice and resolution to the problems at almost doorsteps. Following have been the advantages of the Ordnance in question:
a. Timely disposal of minor cases but urgent in nature like divorce/ small disputes at early stages etc.
b. Courts due to their location were away so approach to the court was not possible at times, so it gave a chance to dispose off the case locally.
c. Cost was reduce of the justice.
d. Socially needs of people were swiftly available to all.
e. Courts were less Burdened.
f. Quality of life became better.
.................
Read it please:
Read it please:
CHAPTER XI
MUSALIHAT ANJUMAN
102. Constitution of Musalihat Anjuman.- (1) In each Union, a Musalihat Anjuman shall be constituted consisting of a panel of three Musaleheen (Conciliators) one of whom shall be its Convener, to be selected by the Insaf Committee of the Union Council, within thirty days after its election, from amongst the residents of the Union who are publicly known to be persons of integrity, good judgment and command respect:
Provided that the Union Nazim, Naib Union Nazim or the members of the
Union Council may not be appointed as Musaleheen (Conciliators).
(2) Any casual vacancy in the panel of Musaleheen (Conciliators) shall be filled in by the Insaf Committee, as soon as practicable.
(3) The Musaleheen (Conciliators) shall be selected for the term of the Union Council or until replaced earlier: Provided that Musaleheen (Conciliators) shall be eligible for reselection.
(4) Where in the opinion of the Insaf Committee, a Musleh (Conciliator) is accused of consistent partiality and malpractices in performance of his functions, the Insaf Committee may, subject to notice to show cause, remove such Musleh (Conciliator) and select another Musleh (Conciliator) in his place.
103. Encouragement for amicable settlement of disputes.- (1) The Union Nazim, members of the Insaf Committee and Musaleheen (Conciliators) shall use their good offices to achieve the amicable settlement of disputes amongst the people in the Union through mediation, conciliation and arbitration, whether or not any proceedings have been instituted in a court of law in respect of such disputes:
Provided that such settlement shall be carried out in such cases where all the parties to the dispute agree thereto and no fee shall be charged for such settlement:
1[Provided further that in bringing parties to a dispute to an amicable settlement, Musalihat Anjuman shall have regard to the provisions of section 345 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (Act V of 1898), Hadood laws and all other laws for the time being in force whereunder certain offences are not compoundable:
Provided further that every settlement brought by Musalihat Anjuman in a case pending before a court shall be subject to the approval of such court.]
Explanation. – For the purpose of this section, the expression ‘dispute’ relates to
disputes amongst the individuals, whether of civil or criminal nature.
104. Courts may refer cases to Musalihat Anjuman.- (1) Any court of
competent jurisdiction may, in a case where it deems appropriate, refer a matter
to the Musalihat Anjuman through the Union Nazim for settlement.
(2) The court making a reference to Musalihat Anjuman for settlement
of a dispute under subsection (1) may lay down the procedure for summoning the
parties to the dispute, the terms of reference, the period during which settlement
is to be made, the manner in which report of the settlement is to be submitted
and such other matters as it may deem appropriate for resolution of the dispute.
(3) Where on a reference made by the court under subsection (1), the
dispute is settled between the parties, the court may make such settlement as a
Rule of the Court.
(4) The Musalihat Anjuman shall inform the court if the dispute is not
settled within the time fixed by the court or, may ask for extension in time for
settlement of the dispute.
105. Appointment of Musleh (Conciliator) for individual cases.- Where in a
dispute the parties request for appointment of a person other than the
Musaleheen (Conciliators) in the panel referred to in section 102 in a particular
case as a Musleh (Conciliator), the Union Nazim may, in consultation with the
Insaf Committee, appoint such person as Musleh (Conciliator) for that case.
106. Procedure of settlement of disputes.- (1) The Convener of the
Musalihat Anjuman selected under section 102 shall-
(a) convene meetings of the Musalihat Anjuman as necessary and
at such place or places in the union as he considers appropriate;
and
(b) conduct the proceedings in an informal manner as he considers
appropriate with the object to bring an amicable settlement
between the parties.
(2) No legal practitioner shall be permitted to take part in the
proceedings on behalf of any party.
(3) The report of the Musaleheen (Conciliators) shall be recorded in
writing and copies thereof shall be provided to the parties attested by the
Secretary of the Union.
